This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5600 - request for additional examples
Summary: request for additional examples
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: LC
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: Kumar Pandit
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: externalComments, reviewerSatisfied
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-01 16:06 UTC by Andrew Eisenberg
Modified: 2008-12-09 18:00 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Andrew Eisenberg 2008-04-01 16:06:40 UTC
While Appendices B-F contain examples of SML, there are none in the body 
of the document. The XML Query WG suggests that additional small, focused examples would improve the readability of the specification.
Comment 1 Virginia Smith 2008-04-01 17:24:00 UTC
The working group intends to insert references to the appropriate appendix examples within the specification text. If you have specific cases where more examples will help, please let us know.


-------
The SML WG believes that the above proposal resolves this issue fully.  I'm
changing its status accordingly.

The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this
issue, to whom the following request is addressed.

Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this
resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing
the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this
resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to
Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the
decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we
do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the
WG decision.
Comment 2 Andrew Eisenberg 2008-04-02 18:22:33 UTC
Your change satisfies our comment.
Comment 3 Kumar Pandit 2008-08-28 18:30:20 UTC
resolution on 8/28:
The draft sent by Kumar (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Aug/att-0098/diff-sml.html) is approved.
Comment 4 Kumar Pandit 2008-08-29 01:12:20 UTC
fixed per comment# 3.