This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Minor comment from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html 4.4.1.2: It's very confusing to call this a "Schema validity rule" -- please use "Constraint on schema component". 4.4.2.1, 4.4.2.2 -- as above for section names 4.5.1.1, 4.5.1.2 -- as above for section names
"Schema Validity Rule" is used as the title for following sections 5.1.1.2 5.1.2.2 5.2.1.2 6.3.2
resolution (3/6 conf call): Proposal: Rename 'schema validity rules' to 'schema component rules' The SML WG believes that the above proposal resolves this issue fully. I'm changing its status accordingly. The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
fixed per comment# 2
I'm can livewith the adopted resolution, although I prefer my original suggestion. . . .