This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
1 - Section 5.1 - how should we phrase the last paragraph. Schematron does not have the concept of binding. In addition, should we be talking about binding patterns to elements or documents? 2 - Section 5.1 - need to fix last example to work correctly with whatever we decide on #1 above.
The only bindng concept that schematron spec defines is 'query language binding'. It does not define any other binding. In SML/SML-IF domain, a rule document can be bound to other documents. There is no notion of binding pattern to something. Proposal: [1] change the last sentence in 5.1. from: The binding of the StudentPattern pattern to instances of StrictUniversity element is implementation-dependent and hence outside the scope of this specification. to: The binding of the rule document containing the StudentPattern pattern to documents that may contain instances of StrictUniversity element is implementation-dependent and hence outside the scope of this specification. [2] Fix the last example appropriately.
Fix per proposal.
fixed as proposed.