This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5327 - [XQTS] modules-circular expects XQST0073
Summary: [XQTS] modules-circular expects XQST0073
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Query Test Suite
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XML Query Test Suite (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrew Eisenberg
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-12-19 18:06 UTC by Oliver Hallam
Modified: 2008-07-25 06:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Oliver Hallam 2007-12-19 18:06:28 UTC 
The XQTS test "modules-circular" expects the error XQST0073 but this error code has been deleted by XQuery erratum XQ.E8 (as discussed in bug 4418).
Comment 1 Frans Englich 2008-06-26 10:28:07 UTC 
I changed to XQST0093 in CVS, I *hope* this is right.
Comment 2 Oliver Hallam 2008-06-26 14:07:28 UTC 
As far as I can tell, the correct behavior for this test is to return "ok".

This is because although test1c1-lib and test2c2-lib import each other, neither has a direct dependency on the other, which as far as I can tell is now allowed.
Comment 3 Frans Englich 2008-06-26 15:40:33 UTC 
Changed in CVS as requested in comment #2.
Comment 4 Oliver Hallam 2008-06-30 09:00:11 UTC 
Although the results file has appeared in CVS, XQTSCatalog.xml does not seem to have been updated.
Comment 5 Frans Englich 2008-07-23 10:47:13 UTC 
Should be fixed in CVS.
Comment 6 Oliver Hallam 2008-07-23 13:32:27 UTC 
Catalog003 is now failing - the scenario should be set to "standard", not "runtime-error".
Comment 7 Frans Englich 2008-07-24 05:58:51 UTC 
Right, fix attempted in CVS.
Comment 8 Oliver Hallam 2008-07-24 17:03:48 UTC 
Apologies for dragging this out for so long, but the result I gave in comment #2 was wrong.

The correct result is:
<result>ok</result>
Comment 9 Frans Englich 2008-07-25 06:56:08 UTC 
No problem, apologies for the test being broken in the first place..

The test should be changed as requested in comment #8, in CVS.