This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 5048 - Where should sml:acyclic be specified?
Summary: Where should sml:acyclic be specified?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: Second draft
Assignee: Valentina Popescu
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: editorial
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-09-13 20:27 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2007-09-20 17:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2007-09-13 20:27:24 UTC 
There are places in the spec that indicates "sml:acyclic" are specified on element declaration, but there are other places suggesting complex type definitions. Which one is correct?

I think it should only be complex type definitions. Note that all examples have sml:acyclic on complex types.
Comment 1 Pratul Dublish 2007-09-13 22:30:21 UTC 
sml:acyclic should be allowed on complex-type definitions only. Please point out the places in the spec that indicate sml:acyclic may be specified on element declarations so that we can fix them
Comment 2 Sandy Gao 2007-09-19 17:53:03 UTC 
Search for "element declaration" in section "8.1.1 sml:acyclic".
Comment 3 Pratul Dublish 2007-09-20 16:39:45 UTC 
I don't see any occurence of "element declaration" in section 8.1.1 in the latest editor's draft of SML spec
Comment 4 Valentina Popescu 2007-09-20 16:59:54 UTC 
Pratul, I fixed this already in the second draft 
I'll assign the defect to me, mark it second draft, editorial and set status to fix
Comment 5 Valentina Popescu 2007-09-20 17:02:46 UTC 
Changed sml.xsd ( comment section ) and 8.1.1 to refer to complex type as the only option for specifying sml:acyclic