This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4976 - Is "multiple targets" a reference error?
Summary: Is "multiple targets" a reference error?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: SML
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: LC
Assignee: Kumar Pandit
QA Contact: SML Working Group discussion list
URL:
Whiteboard: SML references
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-22 03:11 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2007-10-20 02:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2007-08-22 03:11:36 UTC
In section 3.1.2.1 "At Most One Target"

"If a single reference element has multiple representations, every representation MUST target the same element.  Validators MAY check this condition."

We need to clarify what this means.

1. It seems to be a contradiction to have "MUST" then "MAY". If we meant "MUST", then validators must check and report an error if the rule is violated; if we meant "MAY", then "MUST" should become "SHOULD".

2. If we meant "SHOULD" and "MAY", are we not concerned with potential interoperability problems? (SML models are labeled valid by some processors and invalid by others.)

3. What does "every representation MUST target the same element" mean? If 2 schemes (S1 and S2) are used. Is it allowed for neither S1 nor S2 to resolve? Is it OK for S1 to resolve and S2 not to resolve?

4. Processors may not support all schemes used by a reference element, so we need to qualify the above rule by saying "every *recognized* representation MUST target the same element".
Comment 1 Kumar Pandit 2007-09-27 03:21:48 UTC
Based on Sandy's original comment, I suggest the definition below:

"If a single reference element has multiple representations, every recongnized representation MUST target the same element.  Validators MUST check this condition."
Comment 2 Virginia Smith 2007-10-17 20:29:44 UTC
Resolution is to fix per Sandy's sml reference proposal
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Sep/0268.html