This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4854 - [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?
Summary: [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS-Policy
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Guidelines (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Web Services Policy WG QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-07-13 01:37 UTC by Asir V Selvasingh
Modified: 2007-07-17 10:27 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Asir V Selvasingh 2007-07-13 01:37:46 UTC 
Title: [Guidelines] Fictitious, why not real examples?

Description:

Section 5.6.1 [1] uses fictitious examples such as:

/samplePrefix:SampleAssertion/@any

Why not use a real assertion? Say, WS-Addressing Policy Assertions [2] or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion [3].

Justification:

Should consider using real assertions, when available.

Proposal:

Use Ws-Addressing policy assertions or WS Reliable Messaging Policy Assertion.

[1] http://tinyurl.com/2hm9cc#d3e783
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/05/addressing/metadata/ws-addr-metadata.xsd
[3] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html#_Toc160540908
Comment 1 Christopher Ferris 2007-07-17 10:27:55 UTC 
RESOLUTION: issue 4854 closed with /wsrmp:RMAssertion/@{any} instead of /samplePrefix:SampleAssertion/@any
See http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-ws-policy-irc#T10-27-13

Note, references to be updated by editors