This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Hi all, we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until after PR, I expect. The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2]. The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too: MessageExchangePatterns and their labels: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only SafeInteraction class: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions OperationStyles: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc Signature extension: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc The bindings: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces?