This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 472 - CDL - Are abstract choreographies worth the effort?
Summary: CDL - Are abstract choreographies worth the effort?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS Choreography
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: --
Assignee: Greg Ritzinger
QA Contact:
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/p...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-20 15:26 UTC by Greg Ritzinger
Modified: 2004-03-04 13:35 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Greg Ritzinger 2004-01-20 15:26:37 UTC 
I am still unconvinced that defining abstract choreographies is worth the 
effort. If they were not defined, no new syntax (or just a minimum amount) 
would be required for Types, Messages, Operations, Interactions/Channels, 
Reliability, Semantics, etc., since those constructs would already be 
available at the WSDL abstract level.
(Corda)
Comment 1 Martin Chapman 2004-03-04 08:35:39 UTC 
the f2f meeting in march 2004 agreed that abstract without wsdl should not be 
addressed by the group.