This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4703 - [FT] editorial: 3 Full-Text Selections
Summary: [FT] editorial: 3 Full-Text Selections
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Full Text 1.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: All All
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jochen Doerre
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-23 09:59 UTC by Michael Dyck
Modified: 2007-10-26 22:27 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Michael Dyck 2007-06-23 09:59:33 UTC 
3 Full-Text Selections

[1]
"In the following the syntax"
    After "following", insert comma.

[2]
"A full-text selection specifies the possible full-text search conditions"
    Why just the "possible" conditions?
Comment 1 Jochen Doerre 2007-09-10 19:41:36 UTC 
[1]: done
[2]: left as is.
Would you prefer "alternatives". Isn't that the "possibilities"?

Best,
 /Jochen
Comment 2 Michael Dyck 2007-09-10 21:18:24 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> [2]: left as is.
> Would you prefer "alternatives".

You mean,
  "A full-text selection specifies the alternative full-text search conditions"
? I don't think that's an improvement.

To me, including the word "possible" suggests a distinction from "actual" (where the actual is a subset of the possible), which I don't think is the intent.

If we just deleted "possible":
  "A full-text selection specifies the full-text search conditions"
wouldn't that convey the right idea?
Comment 3 Jochen Doerre 2007-10-11 14:50:03 UTC 
Hi Michael,

this bug can be closed. The spec now contains the wording
(as agreed upon in FTTF-153 telecon:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-query-fttf/2007Sep/0013.html)

A full-text selection specifies the conditions of a full-text search.