This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4381 - Proposal for Binding-0055 and Binding-1207001
Summary: Proposal for Binding-0055 and Binding-1207001
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WSDL
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Philippe Le Hegaret
QA Contact: WSDL Mailing List
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
: 4429 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-08 23:46 UTC by Jonathan Marsh
Modified: 2007-04-26 12:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Jonathan Marsh 2007-03-08 23:46:08 UTC
Binding-0055 states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations and faults of that Interface component."

Binding-1207001 states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the faults of that Interface component that are referenced from any of the operations in that Interface component." 

I think Binding-0055 is not completely valid, since the Binding only needs to define bindings for faults in the interface component that are actually referenced in one of the interface operations.

I suggest two alternatives.

Alternative 1 - Combine the two assertions into a new Assertion. 
i.e. an assertion that states

 "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component and all faults of that Interface component that are referenced from any of the operations in that Interface component." 

Alternative 2 - Alter Binding-0055 to remove the portion relating to faults.
i.e. have Binding-0055 state as follows.

"A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component."
Comment 1 Jonathan Marsh 2007-03-29 17:05:32 UTC
Per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Mar/att-0083/20070329-ws-desc-minutes.html#item05, the WG accepted alternative 2.
Comment 2 Jonathan Marsh 2007-04-19 15:22:40 UTC
*** Bug 4429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***