This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4033 - "(constraining) facets" section missing for "date"
Summary: "(constraining) facets" section missing for "date"
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0/1.1 both
Hardware: All All
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: cluster: presentation
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-12-04 16:30 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2009-04-21 19:21 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2006-12-04 16:30:43 UTC 
In both part 2 1.0 second edition and 1.1 last call draft, "date" doesn't have a section for "(constraining) facets" (while all other primitive types do).  Note that 1.0 first edition had such a section.  Seems that it got replaced by "3.2.9.2 canonical representation" in 2E.
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-05 03:36:39 UTC 
A wording proposal for this issue (among others) was placed on the
server on 4 February 2008 at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.omnibus.200801.html (member-only link).
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2008-02-08 18:46:56 UTC 
The wording proposal mentioned in an earlier comment was considered
and adopted today by the XML Schema Working Group.  Accordingly, I'm
marking this issue resolved.

Since the originator of the issue is a member of the WG, the adoption 
of the proposal by the WG is probably sufficient evidence that the
originator is content with the WG's resolution of the issue.  But if
the editors don't get around to it, it would be convenient if the 
originator could take the time to shift the status of the issue
from RESOLVED to CLOSED.  Thanks.