This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3981 - [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design
Summary: [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS-Policy
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Guidelines (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Web Services Policy WG QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-18 01:19 UTC by Asir V Selvasingh
Modified: 2007-03-14 18:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Asir V Selvasingh 2006-11-18 01:19:37 UTC
Title: What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to policy assertion design?

Description: The Guidelines document is for assertion authors. Section 4 describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions. Compact vs. normal form ('Authoring Styles') is not relevant to policy assertion design. WS-Policy Primer describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions.

Justification: The Guidelines document should focus on guidelines for policy assertion authors. 'Authoring Styles' is not in the minimum to declare victory on the Guidelines document.

Target: Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors.

Proposal: Drop Section 4.

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#compact-full
Comment 1 Christopher Ferris 2007-03-14 18:42:43 UTC
[14:41] scribe: RESOLUTION: Issue 3981 as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Feb/0000.html
[14:41] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[14:41] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/14-ws-policy-irc#T18-42-17