This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
We should clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework / in the attachement document. Justification - Some terms are defined in both documents, see [1] and [2]. People who want to normatively reference these terms should have only one target. Target - The sections at [1] and [2]. Proposal - I see two possibilities: a) Have the term definitions as they are, but adding to one of them a statement like "the normative reference for this definition is at xxx". "xxx" points to the target definition in the other document. b) Have the overlapping definitions only in one document, and pointers in the other. I have no preference for a) or b). Please follow also the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0045.html (original post of this issue). [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-framework.html#Terminology [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-attachement.html#Glossary
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-ws-policy-minutes.html. Accepted with an action item http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-ws-policy-minutes.html#action19 for the editors to implement the change.