This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Issue #35 of i18nCore comments: http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Section 6.6.2: It's not abundantly clear from the text, but i think you mean to say, in the last para, that there are a set of global rules for associating markup that *conforms to Ruby-TR* with ruby concepts. Please make that clearer, and make it clearer that these global rules *do not apply* if the target markup is not identical to or a conformant subset of Ruby-TR. I'm also wondering whether XHTML 1.1 would need such global rules. If it does, it would be a good example to cite.
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/21-i18nits-minutes.html#item02 . Action: working group to look at Felix mail at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0120.html .
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/28-i18nits-minutes.html#item02 . Action: working group to continue discussion.
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/31-i18nits-minutes.html#item03 . ACTION: Felix to draft a text for the role of IRIs before and after ITS processing
resolution for IRI: we put we proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0125.html in a new section 3.5 , with the modifications described here, and change the wording of ref attributes to IRI resolution for ruby and XHTML 2.0: see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0125.html . Action: editors to make the changes and go back to i18n core.
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/09/20-i18nits-minutes.html#action01 . Changes in draft made, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0402.html. Action: WG to discuss.
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/09/27-i18nits-minutes.html#action05 , Working Group agreed with the changes. Wait: reply to i18n core sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Sep/0088.html .
Closed. i18n core WG discussed the reply http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0427.html (see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Sep/0088.html) at http://localhost/2006/10/10-i18ncore-minutes.html#item02 . One request from i18n core: change reference from "RFC 3987" to "RFC 3987 or its successor". See also thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006OctDec/0004.html . i18n ITS WG discussed i18n core request and agreed at http://www.w3.org/2006/10/11-i18nits-minutes.html#item02 .
Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to clarify the relation of the specification to the W3C ruby specification, directionality as defined in CSS 2.1, and the usage of IRIs.