This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3457 - RFC 3066bis
Summary: RFC 3066bis
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: ITS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ITS tagset (show other bugs)
Version: LastCall
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: AfterLC
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Felix Sasaki
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: proposalAccepted, reviewerSatisfied
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-14 19:38 UTC by Yves Savourel
Modified: 2006-10-03 14:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Yves Savourel 2006-07-14 19:38:03 UTC 
Comment 2 of the i18nCore comments:
http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/

"We recommend that you say, BCP 47 instead of RFC 3066bis.

We also strongly recommend that you add the phrase "or its successor" after reference to RFC 3066bis or BCP 47, since RFC3066bis is expected to become obsolete soon after it is released (to make way for RFC 3066ter)."
Comment 1 Felix Sasaki 2006-07-24 17:00:39 UTC 
Resolution: working group agreed with the proposal at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/19-i18nits-minutes.html#item10 .
Action: editors to make the change.
Comment 2 Christian Lieske 2006-08-16 11:54:51 UTC 
Corresponding link might need to be updated. What's the URL to RFC 3066bis?
Comment 3 Felix Sasaki 2006-09-06 15:30:38 UTC 
action: Felix to ask Addison for the correct reference to BCP 47
Comment 4 Felix Sasaki 2006-09-11 00:44:57 UTC 
Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0295.html .
Comment 5 Yves Savourel 2006-09-14 20:18:05 UTC 
Closed. Commenters satisfied see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html
Comment 6 Felix Sasaki 2006-09-27 13:10:16 UTC 
Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to change the reference for language identification.