This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
QT approved comment In 3.3.5.4, it seems odd that "+1" is allowed and "+INF" is not.
WG decided to allow +INF in the lexical types of all data types that allow INF.
A wording proposal to implement the decision recorded in comment #2 is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b3659.html (member-only link). As I post this comment, I learn that one error remains in that proposal, for which I propose the following amendment: in 3.3.5.2 (for float) and 3.3.6.2 (for double), change the right-hand side of the EBNF rule by deleting "minimalNumericalSpecialRep" and inserting "numericalSpecialRep". In D.1.1. optionally merge numericalSpecialRep and minimalNumericalSpecialRep into a single production. (Optional because having two productions is not wrong, it's only unmotivated now.)
The proposal mentioned in comment #3 was adopted today. Michael, as the emissary of the QT WGs, we ask you to inform them of this resolution and signal their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with it in the usual way. Thanks.