This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3240 - Editorial observations on section 2
Summary: Editorial observations on section 2
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: cluster: clarification, presentation
Keywords: editorial
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-09 10:21 UTC by Michael Kay
Modified: 2009-02-13 00:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Michael Kay 2006-05-09 10:21:16 UTC
QT approved comment:

Generally, 2.6.3 seems well constructed, but it seems to repeat a lot of
material that has already been covered in 2.6.2 and 2.6.1.

Looking at section 2 overall, it might seem worth making an early
mention of the fact that the literals used as input to the mapping function
for a datatype are not the literals as written in an instance document, but
the literals that result from applying whitespace normalization rules.
Comment 1 Michael Kay 2007-10-14 22:12:23 UTC
Note that comment #0 uses the section numbering of the document version with change highlighting; for section 2.6, read section 2.4 in the version without change marks.
Comment 2 Dave Peterson 2008-12-12 19:14:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> QT approved comment:

> Looking at section 2 overall, it might seem worth making an early
> mention of the fact that the literals used as input to the mapping function
> for a datatype are not the literals as written in an instance document, but
> the literals that result from applying whitespace normalization rules.

On 5 Dec 2008, the WG accepted a proposal, with some directed modifications that were not to be returened to the WG for further consideration, to satisfy this second part of the bug description.  The result has been incorporated into the master datatypes.xml file, but a new SQ HTML version has not been generated.
Comment 3 Dave Peterson 2009-02-12 23:23:00 UTC
Pproposal approved as amended is now in the status quo and most recent LCWD. 
Hereby marked FIXED.  Mike Kay, please mark it CLOSED unless you have a new
objection.  (I assume you were OK with it when it was approved by the WG since
you were present and didn't object.)  As usual, no action within two weeks will
be assumed to mean concurrence.