This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3175 - [FS] editorial: 2.1.2 Notations for judgments
Summary: [FS] editorial: 2.1.2 Notations for judgments
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Formal Semantics 1.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Hardware: All All
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jerome Simeon
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-03 07:24 UTC by Michael Dyck
Modified: 2007-01-16 17:49 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Michael Dyck 2006-05-03 07:24:51 UTC
2.1.2 Notations for judgments

"Most other judgments .. are .. written in bold fonts."
    Actually, only the symbols are in bold, not the whole judgment.
    So move the "written in bold fonts" phrase from here to
    the paragraph about symbols.

"For example, 'is beautiful', '=>' and ':' are symbols"
    The "is beautiful" judgment is gone.
    Change to "is a positive integer"

"By convention, all patterns in the Formal Semantics correspond to grammar
non-terminals"
    Following up on Bug 1531, this is still not entirely true.
    Here are some counter-examples:
        AttributeValueContent
        Axis
        ConstructionMode
        SequenceOp, ArithOp, UnaryArithOp, ValueOp, GeneralOp
        URI-or-#NULL-NAMESPACE
        Variable
Comment 1 Jerome Simeon 2006-05-09 12:53:36 UTC
Comments #1 and #2 fixed as suggested. The sentence in comment #3 is gone.
- Jerome