This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 2858 - RQ-140 Distinguish negative from positive zero. (negative-positive-zero)
Summary: RQ-140 Distinguish negative from positive zero. (negative-positive-zero)
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: Other All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: status?
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-11 01:48 UTC by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Modified: 2006-10-15 02:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2006-02-11 01:48:08 UTC
This issue was originally reported by XML Schema WG.

R-22 says "The dataypes spec has some inconsistencies with IEEE with
respect certain special values ...". It continues "Are +0 and -0 the
same value?" Further, the F&O discusses both positive and negative
zero as arguments to functions that accept float and double values. In
some cases this is required by backwards compatibility with XPath 1.0
functions such as "round".

This item was mentioned in the meeting of 2003-09-18
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html).

This item was discussed (and phase-1 agreement was reached) in the
meeting of 2003-09-18
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html).

This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-10-16
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2003Oct/0049.html).

This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-10-17
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2003Oct/0071.html).

This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-11-21
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2003Nov/0050.html).

This item was discussed (editors noted that they had long ago proposed
wording) in the meeting of 2004-04-29
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004May/0006.html).

This requirement was discharged by the adoption of a change proposal 
in September 2005.
Comment 1 Dave Peterson 2006-10-15 02:45:06 UTC
Having traced back through RQ14 to R22 to insure that the original was indeed about float and double, I conclude that the original request has been met by text in the LCWD, and no objections surfaced during the comment period for that WD.  Therefore I'm closing this bug.