This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 26624 - cite element description does not reflect html5 definition
Summary: cite element description does not reflect html5 definition
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Simon Pieters
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-08-21 08:51 UTC by steve faulkner
Modified: 2014-08-22 08:56 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description steve faulkner 2014-08-21 08:51:52 UTC
current:
"The cite element now solely represents the title of a work (e.g. a book, a paper, an essay, a poem, a score, a song, a script, a film, a TV show, a game, a sculpture, a painting, a theatre production, a play, an opera, a musical, an exhibition, a legal case report, etc). Specifically the example in HTML4 where it is used to mark up the name of a person is no longer considered conforming."

suggested:

"The cite element represents a reference to a creative work (e.g. a book, a paper, an essay, a poem, a score, a song, a script, a film, a TV show, a game, a sculpture, a painting, a theatre production, a play, an opera, a musical, an exhibition, a legal case report, a web site, a web page, a blog post or comment, a forum post or comment, a tweet, a written or oral statement, etc). It must include the title of the work or the name of the author(person, people or organization) or an URL reference, or a reference in abbreviated form as per the conventions used for the addition of citation metadata."
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-cite-element
Comment 1 Simon Pieters 2014-08-21 09:23:05 UTC
Do you consider the definition in HTML5 to be a change from HTML4 worth mentioning?
Comment 3 steve faulkner 2014-08-21 14:21:12 UTC
(In reply to Simon Pieters from comment #1)
> Do you consider the definition in HTML5 to be a change from HTML4 worth
> mentioning?

yes
Comment 4 Simon Pieters 2014-08-22 07:15:30 UTC
What's the difference?

Note that I don't mention changes that are minor or otherwise I'd have to list exactly all elements which would be a bit pointless. (See the source for elements not listed.)
Comment 5 steve faulkner 2014-08-22 08:56:31 UTC
(In reply to Simon Pieters from comment #4)
> What's the difference?
> 
> Note that I don't mention changes that are minor or otherwise I'd have to
> list exactly all elements which would be a bit pointless. (See the source
> for elements not listed.)

i can live with it not being mentioned