This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#attr-link-rel Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#attr-link-rel Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ Comment: Why is zero tokens in rel allowed? Posted from: 2a00:801:e0:30:514b:81c2:3d3e:2c7d by simonp@opera.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.76 Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1432.31 (Edition Next)
Given rel="foo": relList.remove('foo'); ...leaves an empty rel="". Seems weird that that would be non-conforming.
I don't follow. When would you want to do that?
For example in a blog editor, where you're changing the link to have or not have rel=external as the user decides what the link should point to.
Hmm. OK.