This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Hello, XQTSCatalog.xsd is in my opinion a flexible catalog format which in my case(as implementor) can find use outside the XQuery Test Suite, to use the format to specify other test suites. For that purpose it would for me be useful if instances of XQTSCatalog.xsd could "identify" themselves, that it wasn't assumed that XQTSCatalog.xml is the only instance of XQTSCatalog.xsd(less coupling between format and date). More specifically, I would prefer if XQTSCatalog.xsd instances, the "test suites", carried a title, possibly also a description. The optimal solution from my perspective would be if the "test-suite" element had a "SuiteInfo" element, in analog to test-group's GroupInfo element. Out of curiosity, why is different naming conventions used, "name-name" and "NameName"? (If intrusive changes wasn't an issue, I would make the naming convention consistent, perhaps rename "GroupInfo" to "info", and let group-info, test-case and test-suite have the "info" element as child.) Cheers, Frans
We have added a descriptive element at the beginning of the catalog: <test-suite ... > <test-suite-info> <title>XQuery Test Suite 0.8.6</title> <description> Test Suite for XQuery 1.0. See http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/test-suite/. </description> </test-suite-info> . . . </test-suite> On the naming conventions, they reflect the touch of several of our members over the last year. Some people are more sensitive to name consistency than others. If you agree with this resolution, then please mak this bug as closed.
Thanks a lot for the extension. I'm content with the resolution and therefore change the status to CLOSED. Regards, Frans