This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#imagedata Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#imagedata Referrer: Comment: Provide ImageData constructor. Posted from: 207.218.72.65 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.18 Safari/537.36
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13626465/how-to-create-a-new-imagedata-object-independently should not be that hard. The obvious way to do things should work. I think making it accept a dictionary as single argument where you can specify the various features makes the most sense. W3C HTML has this apparently and Gecko is planning on adding something: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=959958
Checked in as WHATWG revision r8397. Check-in comment: Add a couple of ImageData() constructors, and (in order to make that feasible) drop all the HD stuff on <canvas>. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8396&to=8397
(In reply to contributor from comment #2) > Checked in as WHATWG revision r8397. > Check-in comment: Add a couple of ImageData() constructors, and (in order to > make that feasible) drop all the HD stuff on <canvas>. > http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8396&to=8397 Wasn't the HD stuff removed a while ago? I wonder how it snuck back into the spec.