This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
We need a clean story about which constraints are expressed normatively in part 1 and which in part 2. This affects the definitions of the special simple types, the tableaux, and every other topic touched on by both parts of the spec. This issue is attached to just one of the parts, but the requirement to DECIDE what the story is belongs equally to both parts. (Once we decide, we may need to clone this bug in order to track the task of adjusting the text in each part to match our story.)
This issue was resolved by the adoption of the '1852 proposal' at the Working Group's face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg. The resolution is reflected in the last call working draft of 17 February 2006. This issue should have been mark as RESOLVED / FIXED at that time, but apparently was not. I am marking it that way now, to reduce confusion.