This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 2109 - R-120: Question about the canonical representation of date
Summary: R-120: Question about the canonical representation of date
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0 only
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-09-09 15:09 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2009-04-21 19:25 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2005-09-09 15:09:54 UTC 
Why does the Datatypes spec define no canonical representation of date (unlike 
dateTime and time)? 

See issue 7 from:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JanMar/0476.html
Comment 1 Sandy Gao 2005-09-09 15:10:21 UTC 
Ashok's response: 

"We should fix that. It appears to be an oversight."

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002JanMar/0615.html

Resolution:
Resolved at the May f2f to instruct the editors to draft an erratum consistent 
with the algorithm discussed at the meeting. See meeting minute details.

Proposed text:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0363.html 

Reviewed/approved with ammendments, at Nov. 1 telecon.

Erratum E2-41 added.