This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1892 - R-180: Question about the schema error code property in the PSVI
Summary: R-180: Question about the schema error code property in the PSVI
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.0 only
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: decided
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-26 13:45 UTC by Sandy Gao
Modified: 2007-03-29 18:48 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Sandy Gao 2005-08-26 13:45:09 UTC 
The spec says "If the item is not valid, then a list." So it seems to imply 
that a processor needs to provide such a list if the validity is 
either "invalid" or "unknown". My question is: what should be provided when it 
is "unknown"? 

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0014.html

Also see a response here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0044.html
Comment 1 Sandy Gao 2005-09-23 02:56:16 UTC 
Discussed at 2005-09-02 telecon
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Sep/0053
Error with erratum.
Comment 2 Sandy Gao 2005-10-06 17:11:08 UTC 
Henry's response contains the proposed wording. More specifically, to change 
the [schema error code] property in sections 3.2.5 and 3.3.5 in structures from:
  If the item is not ·valid·, then a list.
to
  If the item is ·invalid·, then a list.
Comment 3 Sandy Gao 2005-10-11 01:41:00 UTC 
Discussed at 2005-10-07 telecon. The wording proposal included in comment #2 
was approved.