This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1687 - [FS] AtomizeAtomic(SequenceType) normaliztion
Summary: [FS] AtomizeAtomic(SequenceType) normaliztion
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Formal Semantics 1.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jerome Simeon
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-17 21:39 UTC by Fred Zemke
Modified: 2005-09-06 13:05 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Fred Zemke 2005-07-17 21:39:16 UTC
4.1.5 Function calls
The subscripts AtomizeAtomic(SequenceType), etc., need to be
explained.  I believe that AtomizeAtomic is the "name" of
the normalization, and SequenceType is the "parameter" of 
the normalization.  For example, AtomizeAtomic(item()*) is one 
instance of the normalization, AtomizeAtomic(xs:integer?) 
is another, etc.

If this is correct, then SequenceType should be italicized.
This would also explain where the italicized SequenceType
comes from in the definition of AtomizeAtomic 
("fn:data(Expr) if SequenceType <: ...").  Otherwise
the reader is not actually told what to substitute for the 
italicized SequenceType, since a nonitalicized SequenceType 
is not necessarily the same thing as an italicized SequenceType.
Comment 1 Jerome Simeon 2005-07-21 00:33:50 UTC
The comment seems mostly editorial. I agree we should add a clarification
explaining that some parameters may be passed during normalization, and that
should go in section 3.2.2 Normalization judgment.

- Jerome
Comment 2 Jerome Simeon 2005-07-22 23:05:41 UTC
RESOLUTION: Bug 1687 is closed.  This is mostly editorial, add a clarification
in 3.2.2.  Dana will respond in Bugzilla.

- Jerome Simeon
On behalf of the XML Query and XSL WGs