This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1642 - [FS] better to say "initial environment" rather than an "initial state"
Summary: [FS] better to say "initial environment" rather than an "initial state"
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Formal Semantics 1.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jerome Simeon
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-15 22:02 UTC by Fred Zemke
Modified: 2007-01-16 17:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Fred Zemke 2005-07-15 22:02:34 UTC
3.1.1 Static context
It says "Environments have an initial state when [expression/query] 
processing begins, containing, for example, the function signatures of 
all built-in functions".  True, but isn't the model that an environment
(or probably more appropriately, an environment group) is invariant?
Saying that it has an initial state gives the impression that this state
may change, whereas the model is to create a whole new environment group
to reflect any evolution in the environment group.
In that case, it would be better to say that there is an initial 
environment group.
Comment 1 Jerome Simeon 2005-07-19 17:19:31 UTC
I believe this is editorial.
- Jerome
Comment 2 Jerome Simeon 2006-04-15 22:52:54 UTC
Removed the confusing usage of 'initial state' to rely on 'initial environment, as suggested.
- Jerome