This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 13696 - appcache & cache-control
Summary: appcache & cache-control
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LC1 HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.DEB.1.10...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-08-06 10:47 UTC by HTML WG bugbot
Modified: 2011-08-06 17:13 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description HTML WG bugbot 2011-08-06 10:47:07 UTC
public-html-comments posting from: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.DEB.1.10.1108031603080.2827@wnl.j3.bet
Comment 1 Michael[tm] Smith 2011-08-06 10:49:00 UTC
[[

In 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/offline.html#downloading-or-updating-an-application-cache
7.3, there is this note:
<<
HTTP caching rules, such as Cache-Control: no-store, are ignored for the 
purposes of the application cache download process.
>>

Either it needs to be called out as a willful violation of RFC2616, or 
step 6 should be amended to add the presence of a Cache-Control: no-store
to the list of failures like this:
<<
Otherwise, if fetching the manifest fails in some other way (e.g. the 
server returns another 4xx or 5xx response or equivalent, or the server 
indicates that the representation cannot be stored, or there is a 
DNS error, or the connection times out, or the user cancels the download, 
or the parser for manifests fails when checking the magic signature)
>> 
The second option would also help apps developers catching wrong 
configuration server-side and allow better caching of those resources 
(like for users behind regional caches).
]]
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-08-06 17:04:04 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Reviewer was reviewing an obsolete draft; this has since changed.
Comment 3 Julian Reschke 2011-08-06 17:13:57 UTC
If it has changed, the resolution should be "fixed" (and it would be good to link to the change).