This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 13595 - Confusing example in 4.5.3 The pre element
Summary: Confusing example in 4.5.3 The pre element
Status: RESOLVED NEEDSINFO
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LC1 HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-08-03 08:15 UTC by Jirka Kosek
Modified: 2011-08-13 19:58 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Jirka Kosek 2011-08-03 08:15:36 UTC
Example showing dialog with computer is using ">" character probably for denoting prompt. As this character is used as markup delimiter as well example looks little bit confusingly. Using alternative prompt character like "$" would make example more digestible.
Comment 1 Michael[tm] Smith 2011-08-04 05:12:17 UTC
mass-move component to LC1
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-08-12 22:51:54 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I've no idea which example you are referring to. Could you be more specific? There's an example in the <samp> element section with a command-line prompt, but it does use $. Do you mean the <pre> element example of Zork? If so, that's just the way Zork I worked, it would be a bit weird to change what the example says to not match the source material!
Comment 3 Jirka Kosek 2011-08-13 19:58:24 UTC
Yes, it was Zork example.

Honestly, I don't know Zork. But those unescaped > at the start of line look confusing. Maybe example could be taken completely out if you don't have example without >.