This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1339 - accessors of the data model sometimes should rely on IRI
Summary: accessors of the data model sometimes should rely on IRI
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Data Model 1.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Norman Walsh
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 1354
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2005-05-11 03:15 UTC by Felix Sasaki
Modified: 2005-09-29 10:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Comment 1 Norman Walsh 2005-05-17 13:53:46 UTC 
The accessors of the data model

The accessors sometimes rely on the data type xs:anyURI, i.e. baseURI (5.2),
document-uri (5.4), unparsed-entity-system-id (5.16). xs:anyURI itself in its
latest version is defined in terms of IRI. I would be good if you could refer to
IRI itself, in addition to anyURI.

Based on Martin's review, comment [20]
Comment 2 Felix Sasaki 2005-05-18 18:52:57 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2

Correction of my own comment: anyURI is so far not defined in terms of any:URI,
hopefully it will be.
Comment 3 Felix Sasaki 2005-05-30 08:35:57 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2
> 
> Correction of my own comment: anyURI is so far not defined in terms of any:URI,
> hopefully it will be.

consensus of the i18n-core-wg, telecon 27 may 2005: approved by i18n-core-wg.
Comment 4 Norman Walsh 2005-06-07 15:36:11 UTC 
I think this should be closed per
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-query-editors/2005Jun/0011.html

Which says, briefly, that we'll apply a systematic change to the documents
explaining why we use URI and how it relates to IRI.
Comment 5 Felix Sasaki 2005-06-22 07:42:06 UTC 
consensus of the 1i8n-core-wg (telecon 21 May 2005):
We regard the issue as closed.
Best regards, Felix Sasaki