This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 12942 - Time element specification phrasing error (Section 4.6.10)
Summary: Time element specification phrasing error (Section 4.6.10)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LC1 HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL:
Whiteboard: <time>
Keywords:
Depends on: 13240
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-06-12 06:23 UTC by Lucas Sa
Modified: 2011-10-29 05:43 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Lucas Sa 2011-06-12 06:23:27 UTC
On the specification of the time element[1], there is an error at the part it explains what happens when the pubdate attr. is not specified:

"If the element does not need a date, *and the datetime attribute is present*, then the attribute's value must be a valid date or time string.

If the element does not need a date, *but the datetime attribute is not present*, then the element's textContent must be a valid date or time string in content."

Instead, it should be:

"If the element does not need a date, *but the datetime attribute is present*, then the attribute's value must be a valid date or time string.

If the element does not need a date, *and the datetime attribute is not present*, then the element's textContent must be a valid date or time string in content."



[1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-time-element
Comment 1 Michael[tm] Smith 2011-08-04 05:01:56 UTC
mass-moved component to LC1
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-09-21 18:25:34 UTC
I think we're going to move away from <time> so this will likely become a non-issue.
Comment 3 Everett Zufelt 2011-10-22 01:09:09 UTC
@Ian

Can you please explain what you mean by "...move away from..."?
Comment 4 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-10-29 05:43:10 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: see bug 13240
Rationale: I've removed <time> from the spec entirely, including the offending spec text above.