This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 12594 - The [MFREL] document does not currently contain the kind of information that is described to have. For example, there is no "status" information. Thus, it is impossible to say which keywords are allowed, though we might guess that keywords in the section
Summary: The [MFREL] document does not currently contain the kind of information that ...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LC1 HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-04 11:07 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2011-08-04 05:15 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2011-05-04 11:07:54 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#head

Comment:
The [MFREL] document does not currently contain the kind of information that
is described to have. For example, there is no "status" information. Thus, it
is impossible to say which keywords are allowed, though we might guess that
keywords in the section "Proposals" have the "proposed" status and no keywords
have "ratified" status.

Posted from: 88.114.29.18
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Comment 1 Edward O'Connor 2011-05-04 15:33:14 UTC 
The three link type statuses defined in HTML5 correspond to sections of the existing-rel-values page as follows: 'ratified' rel values are listed in the 'formats' section, 'proposed' are listed in the 'proposals' sectoin, and 'discontinued' in the 'dropped' section.

That said, if you find the formatting of the existing-rel-values page to be suboptimal, the right venue for pursuing change is in the Microformats community (via the existing-rel-values talk page, directly editing the existing-rel-values page, discussing your proposed changes on one of the Microformats mailing lists, etc.) and not through this BTS.
Comment 2 Michael[tm] Smith 2011-08-04 05:15:21 UTC 
mass-move component to LC1