This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/links.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#link-type-tag Comment: Drop rel=tag. It doesn't seem to be used and doesn't seem to do anything useful. Posted from: 85.227.154.141 User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01
It's used in at least WordPress link clouds and might to be how Technorati and such get the categories for a post. I haven't checked, though.
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag suggests there is some use, so I'm tentatively WONTFIXing this. Cc'ing tantek, though: you wrote the rel-tag wiki page, is it worth keeping this or should we drop it? If we should drop it, please reopen the bug.
mass-moved component to LC1