This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 11870 - What about a minlength attribute? That would be useful in several situations.
Summary: What about a minlength attribute? That would be useful in several situations.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 10053
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LC1 HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-01-26 06:42 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2011-08-04 05:00 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2011-01-26 06:42:44 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/forms.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#client-side-form-validation

Comment:
What about a minlength attribute? That would be useful in several situations.

Posted from: 81.203.220.131
Comment 1 Ms2ger 2011-01-26 19:57:51 UTC 
Such as?
Comment 2 Mounir Lamouri 2011-01-26 20:56:51 UTC 
I do believe that minlength would be useful. The biggest use case would be for password fields. However, this is a duplicate of bug 10053 (you can try to reopen bug 10053 though).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 10053 ***
Comment 3 Michael[tm] Smith 2011-08-04 05:00:53 UTC 
mass-moved component to LC1