This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 11659 - 2.11 Examples
Summary: 2.11 Examples
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: XSLFO
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XSL-FO (show other bugs)
Version: 2.0 Working Draft
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tony Graham
QA Contact: Mailing list for comments on XSL (XSl-FO)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-01-04 09:19 UTC by Dave Pawson
Modified: 2011-01-04 09:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Dave Pawson 2011-01-04 09:19:43 UTC 
It appears that no use is made of fo:number in the example?
Isn't that the purpose of the example?
If it is used, no mention is made of how?
   Confusing to the reader?