This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 11072 - CTA - "Base information set properties"
Summary: CTA - "Base information set properties"
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Ezell
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-10-16 17:38 UTC by Michael Kay
Modified: 2011-01-23 18:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Michael Kay 2010-10-16 17:38:35 UTC
In discussing how CTA tests are evaluated in 3.12.4, the specification speaks of copying the "base information set properties" of certain nodes, including the element information item itself.

It's not clear what exactly is meant by the "base information set properties". I was trying to find out how namespaces are handled, and one can justify copying all in-scope namespaces on the basis that the properties of an EII include [namespace attributes] and [in-scope namespaces]. However, the properties also include [parent], which clearly should not be copied, as well as [attributes] and [children] which are covered by more specific statements.

It should also perhaps be made clear that the [references] property of an attribute information item is not copied.
Comment 1 David Ezell 2010-10-22 16:27:32 UTC
see minutes from the telcon
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2011-01-12 23:22:17 UTC
A wording proposal intended to resolve this issue is now on the server at

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b11072.html
  (member-only link)
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2011-01-22 00:52:12 UTC
On the call of 21 January 2011 the WG approved the wording proposal mentioned in comment 2.
Comment 4 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2011-01-23 16:17:57 UTC
The proposal mentioned in comment 2 has now been integrated into the status-quo documents pointed to from http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xsd-ed-pointers.html (member-only link).
Accordingly I'm marking this issue resolved.

Michael, if you would close it to signal your agreement with the result, or reopen it to signal disagreement?  Thank you.