This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1089 - Need clarifications for 2.2 Requirement A
Summary: Need clarifications for 2.2 Requirement A
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: QA
Classification: Unclassified
Component: QASpec-GL (show other bugs)
Version: LC-2004-11-22
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Karl Dubost
QA Contact: Karl Dubost
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: LC, SpecGL
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-07 15:48 UTC by Karl Dubost
Modified: 2005-04-28 11:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Karl Dubost 2005-02-07 15:48:29 UTC
[[[
About: 2.2 Requirement A: Identify who or what will implement the
specification.
Instead of "Who or what?" maybe it should be "who and/or what?" For WCAG
2.0, not only will developers claim conformance dependent on the use of
technologies (like HTML, CSS, etc.) [i.e., "what"], but organizations
may want to make a conformance claim (about their content) [i.e.,
"who"].  Perhaps this requirement needs clarification.
]]]
Comment 1 Karl Dubost 2005-02-14 13:36:21 UTC
http://www.w3.org/2005/02/07-qa-minutes.html#item02

karl: next issue, 1089
karl: questions about classes of  products wrt "who or what" being clarified as "who and/or  what"
Lynne: I think just changing to  "and/or" is enough
[agreemnt on this]
RESOLUTION: changed  2.2 A to "and/or"
Comment 2 Karl Dubost 2005-03-03 17:42:27 UTC
http://www.w3.org/2005/02/07-qa-minutes

karl: next issue, 1089
karl: questions about classes of  products wrt "who or what" being clarified as "who and/or  what"
Lynne: I think just changing to  "and/or" is enough
[agreemnt on this]

RESOLUTION: changed  2.2 A to "and/or"
Comment 3 Dominique Hazael-Massieux 2005-04-28 11:53:50 UTC
setting version to LC in case of future use