This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Finally I would add one other good practice: specifications should not claim to be simple, easy, device-independent, conformant to WAAA or QAG, or make other claims about their quality or conformance to other specifications. While it is fine to indicate that one of the requirements of the specification may have been to be easy / device- independent / whatever, it should IMHO be up to the reader to make the determination of whether the working group was successful or not. (This is the last of the eleven comment mails I had on the QASG document. I hope they were of use.)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0028.html KD disagrees with this bug. The group consensus is the text is OK as currently written. DH will draft a formal reply [AI-20050214-2] and send it to the QA WG list. Due date is February 21. KD will review the SpecGL [AI-20050214-3]. Due date February 21.
The Working Group agreed with Dom's Proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0043.html
setting version to LC in case of future use