This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 10315 - please allow "command" and "base" in "in head noscript" insertion mode so all void elements that might be handled in head-related insertion modes are treated in the same manner, which would simplify parser implementation a little
Summary: please allow "command" and "base" in "in head noscript" insertion mode so all...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-08-08 05:29 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2010-10-04 14:30 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2010-08-08 05:29:39 UTC 
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#parsing-main-inheadnoscript

Comment:
please allow "command" and "base" in "in head noscript" insertion mode so all
void elements that might be handled in head-related insertion modes are
treated in the same manner, which would simplify parser implementation a
little

Posted from: 121.102.72.35
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-09-10 19:25:51 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale:

<base> is not allowed because having all the URLs in the document have different meanings based on whether you're scripted or not is a debugging nightmare.

<command> is not allowed because it makes no sense when scripts are disabled.

I suppose we could handle them in the parser while making them still non-conforming, but would it really help all that much in the parser's development?