This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1020 - Information model - Section 2.3.2, last paragraph, 1st sentence
Summary: Information model - Section 2.3.2, last paragraph, 1st sentence
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS Choreography
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: --
Assignee: Martin Chapman
QA Contact: Martin Chapman
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/p...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 1018
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-01-20 20:11 UTC by Greg Ritzinger
Modified: 2005-07-18 18:45 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Greg Ritzinger 2005-01-20 20:11:16 UTC
Section 2.3.2, last paragraph, 1st sentence.   
   Information model   
   "Within each role element, the OPTIONAL attribute behavior identifies the
commitment of a party as an XML-Schema list of behavior types belonging to this
Role Type."   
   If the list of behavior types are those "belonging to this Role Type", is
this where a <role> is defined?   
   Or is this <role> not the definition, but a reference to a Role Type defined
by <roleType>?   
   If it is the latter, how is this "list of behavior types" related to the
<behavior> element of <roleType>?   
   Should this "list of behavior types" be constraint to be a subset of the
<behavior> elements of <roleType>?
Comment 1 Martin Chapman 2005-01-25 20:33:45 UTC
editorial
Comment 2 Martin Chapman 2005-01-25 20:33:56 UTC
editorial
Comment 3 Martin Chapman 2005-02-14 20:59:18 UTC
From meeting on 25-jan-05:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01-
25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt

Depends on the 1018 ? editorial.
Comment 4 Greg Ritzinger 2005-05-25 20:40:27 UTC
Section 2.3.2 RelationshipTypes.  Added at end of last paragragh:If the behavior
attribute is present then the behaviors listed MUST be a proper subset of those
belonging to this roleType.
Comment 5 Martin Chapman 2005-07-14 15:23:29 UTC
Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1].
changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-
comments/2005Jul/0002.html
Comment 6 Martin Chapman 2005-07-18 18:45:06 UTC
Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html