This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1016 - Point of clarity - Section 2.2.3, 6th paragraph
Summary: Point of clarity - Section 2.2.3, 6th paragraph
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS Choreography
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: --
Assignee: Greg Ritzinger
QA Contact: Martin Chapman
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/p...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 1015
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2005-01-20 20:06 UTC by Greg Ritzinger
Modified: 2005-07-18 18:44 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Greg Ritzinger 2005-01-20 20:06:47 UTC 
3. Section 2.2.3, 6th paragraph.   
   Point of clarity   
   "Names within a name scope MUST be unique within a WS-CDL document."   
   Is the phrase "within a name scope" irrelevant since the uniqueness scope is
"within a WS-CDL document"?   
   That is, should it be "Each definition type name MUST be unique within a
WS-CDL document."?
Comment 1 Martin Chapman 2005-01-25 20:25:16 UTC 
editorial see 1016
Comment 2 Martin Chapman 2005-02-14 20:54:53 UTC 
From meeting on 25-jan-05:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0010/2005-01-
25_WS-Chor_Notes.txt

Link to 1015.  Editorial as well.
Comment 3 Greg Ritzinger 2005-03-11 18:03:09 UTC 
Names within a name scope MUST be unique within the WSDL document.
Comment 4 Greg Ritzinger 2005-05-25 20:34:14 UTC 
In 2.2.3 changed:
Names within a name scope MUST be unique within a WS-CDL document
to:
Names within a name scope MUST be unique within the WS-CDL document
Comment 5 Martin Chapman 2005-07-14 15:22:22 UTC 
Yin-Leng has been informed of the group's resolution to this issue [1].
changed to closed, and awaiting confirmation.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-
comments/2005Jul/0002.html
Comment 6 Martin Chapman 2005-07-18 18:44:02 UTC 
Yin Leng has confirmed the resolution:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html