This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 10113 - make </rt> optional (in syntax and parser)
Summary: make </rt> optional (in syntax and parser)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: NotInW3CSpecYet
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-07-08 19:49 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-07-18 18:48 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description contributor 2010-07-08 19:49:24 UTC
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#websrt-cue-ruby-span

Comment:
make </rt> optional (in syntax and parser)

Posted from: 85.227.153.23
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-09-28 21:34:43 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: My knee-jerk reaction is that this wouldn't occur enough to make it worth it. It'd be easy to add to the spec if people think it'd be a good thing to add, though. I'm certainly open to adding it if there's a good argument for adding it.
Comment 2 Simon Pieters 2010-09-28 22:43:54 UTC
The discussion that was behind this bug was:

# [21:44] <zcorpan_> Hixie: btw why can't </rt> be omitted?  
# [21:46] <Hixie> in the syntax or in the parser?  
# [21:47] <zcorpan_> both  
# [21:47] <Hixie> didn't really think about it  
# [21:48] <Hixie> just seemed simpler this way  
# [21:48] <Hixie> i guess if people want we can make it optional  
# [21:49] <zcorpan_> i saw subtitles with seemingly deliberatly omitting </i> by just looking at a handful  
# [21:49] <zcorpan_> doesn't seem like a stretch that people are going to omit </rt> especially since it's optional in html  
# [21:49] <Hixie> yeah seems reasonable  
# [21:49] <Hixie> file a bug and i'll look into it  

http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20100708#l-792
Comment 3 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-09-28 23:47:06 UTC
Well at least I'm consistent in my knee-jerk reaction...
Comment 4 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2010-10-04 21:23:12 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Makes the syntax easier, I guess.
Comment 5 contributor 2010-10-04 21:24:08 UTC
Checked in as WHATWG revision r5574.
Check-in comment: Make </rt> optional in WebSRT. Add some ideas for the drag-and-drop model.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5573&to=5574