This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Suggestion from Kohei based on his analysis of the workunit semantics for repetition: > > We therefore believe it is better to have two workunits, one for non-repeating, > and another for repeating. If this is too radical, then we recommend not to have > two conditions, but to differentiate between repeating and non-repeating by: > > repeat = true|false Regards Gary and Steve
From meeting on 11-jan-05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jan/att-0002/2005-01- 11_WS-Chor_Notes.txt: Discussion deferred as deemed to be a technical issue.
agreed to close wontfix at june f2f: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jun/att- 0003/June_2005_F2F_minutes_-_0.txt
group notification of status change: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member- ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html
no comments from group so closed confirmed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html