Meeting minutes
<gb> /issues/107 -> #107
New Business
Jeff: I included a slide on the maturity model in an upcoming presentation
Fazio: TPAC coming up, APA probably meeting a full day, hybrid (in person and virtual options to participate). Any groups or topics we should bring up? (TPAC is a week long)
Angela: Question- how many from this group join APA meetings?
Fazio: I try to attend, but it's early my time
Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback) – Look at Procurement Dimension
stacey Thanks to all who contibuted
staceyTried to plan language. Need people to look at it.
<Rita> Where is the doc?
JKline Requirements for automated and manual testing for final deliverable
stacey What is final deliverable?
JKline Anything.
AngelaBarker Automated and/or test results
JKline Don’t what to get proprietary. An accurate ACR would be okay.
JKline A statement is okay, we don’t want to get to specific
Fazio ACR to verify testing has been performed
Jkline No
JKiline A requirement that automated and manual testing has been performed.
Rita Isn’t the assumption that ACR means you’ve done testing?
JKline No ACR are sometimes written without testing
Fazio Requirement that automated accessibility has been performed on the product, service or final deliverable.
AngelaBarker Manual and/or automated because some orgs only do manual.
AngelaBarker *don't do automated
JKline yes
stacey Stacy will connect with Charles on the github update in the next week or two
Jeff: scoring in clean enough state/set up to track. Not the other format that we looked at.Going to send it out to the working group and see about publishing that link in the next publish round
Fazio: I don't think it's an issue to change up the scoring. We'll get some trial and error on ti anyway. Please send to the working group.
Fazio: maybe sent to accessibility guidelines and APA for feedback?
Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
Stacey: Select "view raw" link to open it
… open the spreadsheet
Fazio: we might want to remove the W3C logo off of the spreadsheet
Jeff: full tally tab - taking percentages complete from the other tabs and dropping them into a table. It will tally everything up and show score for the whole model. We can add more columns/info down the road if we need to. Want to make sure only one element that's scored (like can't have something in launch and integrate), so number of count has
to match number of proof points on the page.
Fazio: next steps: update git hub doc, remove w3c logo, and get it in git and ready to publish
Fazio: will send Jeff mailing lists for APA and AGWG