W3C

– DRAFT –
Maturity Model

17 April 2024

Attendees

Present
CharlesL, Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, jkline, Mark_Miller, NehaJ4, stacey
Regrets
-
Chair
Fazio
Scribe
NehaJ4

Meeting minutes

<gb> /issues/107 -> #107

<gb> /issues/107 -> #107

New Business

<janina> https://github.com/thelounge/thelounge/issues

janina New IRC interface, if face any issue please use above link

Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback)

CharlesL PR is pending

stacey Usability doc feedback can be taken up in next week

stacey one pewrson worked on whole doment or separate people worked on separate dimension?

<Fazio> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wrhomdc2gJWIkDPOveiH3_ig1bddTMonEhIDZIzohrc/edit?pli=1

Fazio people worked on different dimension

Fazio should we have consistency across introduction of each section?

jeff how closely we have to sychronize the document proof points from the dimension?

Fazio proof points should be provided with examples, or proof point for particular dimension should help

Mark_Miller + 1 to this

Mark_Miller we should make a list of tasks like proof points

Fazio yes can be tracked with github issue

ack, Mark_Miller

Fazio standardization on language, breaking long sentences and using simple plain language

Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update

Fazio we will get feedback from APA group on the draft version, once it is ready

Mark_Miller to add exmaple in scoring document

Fazio best to track this with github issue

<Fazio> ack, CharlesL

CharlesL agree for github issue tracking

<Zakim> janina, you wanted to ask whether multiple models might be practical?

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 221 (Fri Jul 21 14:01:30 2023 UTC).

Diagnostics

Succeeded: s/2/3/

No scribenick or scribe found. Guessed: NehaJ4

Active on IRC: CharlesL, Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, jkline, Mark_Miller, NehaJ4, stacey