Meeting minutes
<gb> /issues/101 -> #101
New Business
all: discussion about gathering at CSUN
Fazio: Neha, David, Volker, Sheri, Charles, Mark would be there
Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback)
<Stacey> Doc for agenda item 2: https://
sbyrnehaber: Seems more like an Implementation Guide than a Usability doc
Stacey: everyone should do a quick read-through if you haven't looked at it outside of the core meeting
Stacey: the document customizes each dimension with what types of proof points are valid for for each level
Stacey: reviewed communications as an example
Lionel_Wolberger: Scope is not overt, the list is intimidating
lionel: informal communications could include chats at the coffee pot
Lionel_Wolberger: is there a place where the scope needs to be defined?
stacey: should we add a section in the "how to rate and evaluate" to include directions on the fact that orga/individuals can define their scope in the spreadsheet...assessment scope...they can mark things as not applicable, etc.
… See spreadsheet for defining scope (as an example)
sbyrnehaber: assessment scope is the first field in the spreadsheet, also, n/a can be used to limit scope
<Lionel_Wolberger> Jeff: The Excel does have fields for the declaration of scope. The "Final totals" tab says, scope.
<Lionel_Wolberger> ... each tab has, as row 2, "Assessment Scope"
david: provided accessibility example using his communications with an individual who is d/Deaf
example of informal communication
<Lionel_Wolberger> sbyrnehaber: Taking the lawyer's perspective, any communication that would be exposed in discovery, could be in scope
Sheri: anything that can be demanded in litigation could be included in informal communications
Stacey: Sounds like we are defining what 'informal communication' means, and not talking about the evaluation phase
<janina> http://
Does this doc help with the social expecations of a11y collaboration? Tech needs to cover, but not every team will have all situations on the team. Take the considerations that pertain and leave the rest.
Jeff: encompassing as possible, but people need to use their own judgement. But we don't want to leave a huge loophole for avoidance of resolving IT accessibility. Informal and formal IT is fine. Let's leave for now.
<CharlesL> +1 Foundation...
<CharlesL> We need to capitalize Accessible Communications