Meeting minutes
pkra: agenda items
… * update on spec markup for advice for AT (jnurthen)
… review updates to Valerie's PR for replacing the mapping tables in the AAMs (core-aam#180)
… prettier experiment w3c/
… quo vadis contributors.md
… organizing ARIA 1.4 prioritization
… daniel
… item 1, spec markup
jamesn: have started on it.
… skeptical on how useful it will be.
… not enough AT requirements to make it useful
… if we markup author and UA, it will be too much
… why one but not the others? Can't we just search for them?
… maybe instead, just pick a searchable string to find them?
spectranaut: I like that idea.
pkra: +1
jamesn: we can put that at the start of each paragraph where we want it.
spectranaut: sentences can be nested.
… what if more than one?
jamesn: have both.
… do it as a class and spec generation could add it afterwards.
… consistency will be key
spectranaut: sounds like script should be you, then adding the class can be done by others
jamesn: either use a class or data attribute and then generate a string. could be something else later, e.g., image.
… you could still search the source
pkra: +1 data attributes but whatever works
item 2, Val's PR
spectranaut: feel like scotto and pkra approved it.
… haven't finished it yet though.
<spectranaut_> https://
<spectranaut_> https://
jamesn: looks ok. if implementors are happy, let's do it.
spectranaut: last point was table caption.
… repeats what's in the heading but with links to aria
jamesn: could help AT users to have option to navigate by headings or tables
pkra: alternatively, we discussed putting a line in tables with links to aria concepts.
jamesn: or put links in the headings?
… maybe respec doesn't like that.
spectranaut: maybe I'll ping Jamie Teh.
jamesn: great idea.
item 3, prettier experiment
jamesn: why long lines?
pkra: because you asked for it? ;-)
… to avoid weird prettier formatting around tags
jamesn: and still people can edit the doc any way they want and CI will reformat?
pkra: yes.
spectranaut: will there be conflicts for PRs?
pkra: yes.
jamesn: there will never be a good time.
… we should do it before 1.3 FPWD
… will take a look
pkra: item 4, contributors.md
<jamesn> https://
pkra: Daniel is out this week but promised to take a look
jamesn: we should compare what it generates, then decide.
… for example, compared to git contributor graph
pkra: item 5, 1.4 prioritization
<spectranaut_> w3c/
pkra: had triggered me in terms of the state of our projects
… wasn't sure if projects works for us.
spectranaut: long time ago I made a board with all issues.
pkra: https://
<jamesn> fyi this is the list of contributors
<jamesn> Aaron Leventhal
<jamesn> Adam Page
<jamesn> Alexander Surkov
<jamesn> Amelia Bellamy-Royds
<jamesn> Andrea N. Cardona
<jamesn> Anne van Kesteren
<jamesn> Anne-Gaelle Colom
<jamesn> Ariella Gilmore
<jamesn> Boaz
<jamesn> Bogdan Brinza
<jamesn> bpmcneilly
<jamesn> Brennan Young
<jamesn> Carolyn MacLeod
<jamesn> Craig Morten
<jamesn> Cynthia Shelly
<jamesn> D.A. Kahn
<jamesn> Dan Bjorge
<jamesn> Domenic Denicola
<jamesn> Epigenetic
<jamesn> Estelle Weyl
<jamesn> Games for Girls
<jamesn> Harris Schneiderman
<jamesn> Innovimax
<jamesn> Isaac Durazo
<jamesn> Ivan Herman
<jamesn> JaEun Jemma Ku
<jamesn> James Craig
<jamesn> Jason Kiss
<jamesn> JAWS-test
<jamesn> JAWS-test2
<jamesn> joanmarie
<jamesn> Jon Gunderson
<jamesn> Jory Cunningham
<jamesn> Joseph Scheuhammer
<jamesn> Josh Salazar
<jamesn> Kagami Sascha Rosylight
<jamesn> Manuel Rego Casasnovas
<jamesn> Marcos Cáceres
<jamesn> Marek Lewandowski
<jamesn> Matt Garrish
<jamesn> Matt King
<jamesn> Melanie Richards
<jamesn> Melanie Sumner
<jamesn> Nick Schonning
<jamesn> Nicolás Alvarez
<jamesn> Philippe Le Hegaret
<jamesn> Prayag Verma
<jamesn> Richard Schwerdtfeger
<jamesn> Rick Brown
<jamesn> Sarah Higley
<jamesn> Sayan Sivakumaran
<jamesn> Scott O'Hara
<jamesn> Sebastian Silbermann
<jamesn> Shane McCarron
<jamesn> Shota FUJI
<jamesn> Simon Pieters
<jamesn> Stephane Deschamps
<jamesn> Steve Faulkner
<jamesn> Thibaud Colas
<jamesn> Tyler Wilcock
<jamesn> Tzviya
<jamesn> Valerie Young
<jamesn> Vyacheslav Aristov
<jamesn> Wilco Fiers
<jamesn> WilliamTennisNFCU
<jamesn> based on respec
pkra: e.g., https://
jamesn: sorry for the buffer dump. this is what respec gives me from git.
jamesn: we could have this one as contributors and then also members at time of publication
spectranaut: +1
pkra: jamesn are you volunteering?
jamesn: yes.
pkra: back to 1.4 prio?
spectranaut: project 18 was trying to help people prioritze.
… should we move them to 1.4? Will create big bucket.
pkra: doesn't seem to help people?
spectranaut: maybe we should push more.
jamesn: I'd say step 1: punt features to 1.4
… clarification can be revisited when 1.3 in FWPD
… maybe agenda item for this week
pkra: I went through non-milestoned issues and PRs a while back and assigned them so sorting by milestone should help.
… so what about 1.4?
jamesn: talk about it at TPAC