W3C

- DRAFT -

WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference

03 Nov 2022

Attendees

Present
LauraBMiller, pday, ThorstenKatzmann, Devanshu, FernandaBonnin, maryjom, Cara_Henderson, Sam, bruce_bailey, MichaelC, olivia-hogan-stark, Daniel, AnastasiaLanz, ShawnT, Mike-Pluke, GreggVan, BryanTrogdon, shadi
Regrets
Chair
Mary Jo Mueller
Scribe
Devanshu

Contents


<maryjom> meeting: WCAG2ICT Task Force Teleconference

<scribe> scribe: Devanshu

Announcements

<pday> https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/wiki/IRC-information - if you need it Devanshu it has a few key commands

maryjom: best way to work on the template, poll on meeting prep

<maryjom> https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/discussions/48

<bruce_bailey> thanks for looking into markdown -- timing should be fine

<ShawnT> +1 to markdown

maryjom: poll about Weigh in on possible new section to add, publication history in draft

<Zakim> bruce_bailey, you wanted to clarify "used in regulation" ?

maryjom: Talk about Poll next week

bruce: more formal citation?

<bruce_bailey> please be careful with "referenced" or "cited" -- "used" "important"

<bruce_bailey> relied upon are fair!!!

<GreggVan> +1 to relied upon

<bruce_bailey> +1 to history of regulatory use since 1st version

<GreggVan> +1 to history of regulatory use since 1st version

<bruce_bailey> +1 to poll and polling functionality

<ShawnT> +1

<ShawnT> I'm adding it to my project!

<FernandaBonnin> +1

maryjom: General feeling about polling?

<pday> +1 to poll (when I remembered to click on the link!)

<AnastasiaLanz> +1 I liked it and didn't know it existed

<Zakim> LauraBMiller, you wanted to say liked it

<olivia-hogan-stark> +1 I liked it!

<Mike-Pluke> +1 Liked it

Laura: multiple select options

<Zakim> LauraBMiller, you wanted to ask if that's important

<ShawnT> Polling on Github discussions: https://docs.github.com/en/discussions/collaborating-with-your-community-using-discussions/participating-in-a-discussion#creating-a-poll

maryjom: Poll is not for consensus based decision, easy to discuss about the poll

Success criterion templates

maryjom: three different templates, wcag2ict repo -> new issue or wiki -> Template for success criteria
... Copy content of the template then create a new page
... Word template link also present

<maryjom> https://ibm.box.com/v/WCAG2ICT-SC-Template

<bruce_bailey> word version of template in box opened for me without authentication

Fernanda: Template for people not part of WCAG2ICT

<Zakim> pday, you wanted to Are we using markdown as well as HTML for editing, or just markdown?

<ShawnT> every template you create creates a "get started" button

<ShawnT> You can also create forms using issue templates

<ShawnT> https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml

<Zakim> bruce_bailey, you wanted to ask what MaryJo wanted to do with colors in template?

<ShawnT> https://github.com/vitejs/vite/issues/new?assignees=&labels=pending+triage&template=bug_report.yml

Shawn: issue reports forms

<pday> +1 on forms if it means less need for all to learn markdown

<pday> -1 on forms if we cannot hide irrelevant sections in the form - otherwise it might be too much info

<bruce_bailey> One feature in Word and Google docs missing from markdown / wikitext / html is TrackChange

<bruce_bailey> But i have not found TrackChanges to work with more than two editors...

<bruce_bailey> And i have found GitHub to work well with multiple editors !

<bruce_bailey> It is a different paradigm of course.

<bruce_bailey> nevermind -- i figured it out i think

<ShawnT> does everyone know what @@ symbols mean? (newbie here)

<Zakim> bruce_bailey, you wanted to double check

<bruce_bailey> thank you! new issue behavior is different from main wcag repo

maryjom: put link to create new issue in wiki

<Zakim> pday, you wanted to How do we handle closed systems - just a high-level exclusion, or include explicit mention in each SC instructional note?

<bruce_bailey> Good question @ShawnT -- @@ is a convention for "look here" or "come back to this later" or "needs attention"

<bruce_bailey> because @@ is ascii art for eyeballs

<shadi> +1 to Mike

<pday> +1 to Mike- fair point - I agree!

<Mike-Pluke> +1 to Shadi's suggestion

<pday> Apologies - I've got to drop for another call

<Zakim> Sam, you wanted to more appropreit for moble devices or ones that have hardware assist. Some software must require hardware like a geomagnetic field sensor to change orientation

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.200 (CVS log)
$Date: 2022/11/03 15:03:03 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/don't say/be careful with/
Succeeded: s/TrackChange/TrackChanges/
Present: LauraBMiller, pday, ThorstenKatzmann, Devanshu, FernandaBonnin, maryjom, Cara_Henderson, Sam, bruce_bailey, MichaelC, olivia-hogan-stark, Daniel, AnastasiaLanz, ShawnT, Mike-Pluke, GreggVan, BryanTrogdon, shadi
Found Scribe: Devanshu
Inferring ScribeNick: Devanshu

WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]